Learn how explainability, governance, and auditability in agentic AI systems help ensure safe, ethical, and accountable deployment while keeping innovation on track.
Agentic AI marks a paradigm shift. These aren’t just smart tools; they are systems that perceive, reason, plan, act, and learn in pursuit of complex goals. From automated threat detection in cybersecurity operations to IT ticket triage and identity governance, agentic AI is transforming enterprise workflows. Not to mention it’s also powering self-driving cars, managing supply chains, and more.
But in our rush to deploy these systems, we risk overlooking critical safeguards. The “forgotten pants” of agentic AI are the foundational elements such as explainability (XAI), governance, compliance, auditability, and attribution that ensure these systems are safe, ethical, and accountable.
These aren’t optional features; they’re essential for trust, accountability, and long-term success. To unlock the full potential of agentic AI, we must pair innovation with responsibility, building systems that are not just powerful, but also transparent and trustworthy.
The post below explains one of the most critical safeguards: explainability, and how it enables safe and secure agentic AI adoption.
Traditional AI models are often criticized as “black boxes.” Explainable AI (XAI) is about shedding light into this black box, making the agent’s internal workings and decision processes transparent and understandable.
We need real-time interpretability that enables humans to understand and intervene in an agent’s reasoning process while it’s unfolding—not after the fact. This includes:
XAI is for bias mitigation, fairness, and legal compliance. Without it, we lose the ability to correct, trust, and evolve.
As agentic AI systems gain greater autonomy, traditional reactive governance models are no longer sufficient. What’s needed is a proactive, comprehensive framework of rules, policies, and oversight mechanisms that ensure these systems operate ethically, legally, and in alignment with human intent.
The NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) provides a forward-looking approach to governance. It emphasizes risk mapping, measurement, and mitigation strategies while promoting transparency, documentation, and continuous oversight. Crucially, it treats governance as an adaptive life cycle rather than a static checklist.
When applied effectively, the AI RMF helps bridge the gap between technical implementation and ethical expectation, providing a shared language for developers, executives, and regulators to align on responsible AI deployment.
The global regulatory landscape for AI is rapidly evolving, with frameworks like the EU AI Act and California AI Transparency Act leading the way. As with past tech shifts, organizations must recognize that what is voluntary today will be mandatory tomorrow.
Agentic AI introduces unique challenges that demand more than performance metrics. It requires conformance to legal, ethical, and operational standards. A proactive compliance strategy is essential to stay ahead of regulatory expectations.
The concept of a “black box” agent is unacceptable in regulated or critical environments. Auditability must be designed into agentic systems from the start, not added as an afterthought. Every action, decision, and interaction must be:
This level of transparency supports compliance, enables incident response, and builds public trust.
Emerging technologies like blockchain-based audit trails offer tamper-evident, decentralized ledgers that enhance traceability, particularly in multi-party and cross-organizational agentic ecosystems.
Attestation confirms that an action occurred—what was done, when, and by whom. Attribution takes it further by linking actions to intent and responsibility.
In ephemeral environments, where agents spin up, interact, and terminate dynamically, this chain of custody becomes fragile. Without trustworthy attestation, accountability breaks down. For attestation to be meaningful, it must be consistent, traceable, and clearly attributed.
Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems
When multiple agents collaborate toward a shared outcome, determining the source of a specific outcome—whether positive or negative—can be difficult. Like a game of telephone, errors or biases can cascade across the agent network. Clear attribution chains are necessary to assign credit or responsibility, especially when agents build on each other’s actions.
Attribution When Agents Act on Behalf of Users
When an agent acts as a delegate for a human, we must ask: Who authorized this? Under what conditions? What were the boundaries? Without verifiable delegation records, accountability gaps appear where neither human nor machine can be held fully responsible. Modern systems must capture intent, delegation, and execution context to prevent these trust failures.
Let’s be honest, we’re not lacking innovation. We’re drowning in it. What we’re short on is restraint, structure, and the willingness to say, “Just because we can doesn’t mean we should—at least not yet.”
Agentic AI isn’t some future abstraction here; it’s already making decisions, taking action, and blurring lines between human intent and machine autonomy. But with this power comes an uncomfortable truth: if we don’t build accountability now, we won’t get a second chance when things go sideways.
We need to shift the narrative from “move fast and break things” to “think strategic, act tactical, while moving fast.” That means:
We should strive for perfection, but we must not settle for shortcuts. Agentic AI has the potential to reshape how we live and work. It deserves a foundation just as intelligent as the systems we are building.
The power of agentic AI is undeniable. But so are the risks of forgetting the fundamentals in our haste. We are entering a bold new era of intelligent autonomy, and progress without preparation leaves us exposed.
The metaphor of the forgotten pants is more than a punch line, it’s a wake-up call. If we want to step confidently into the future, we need to be fully prepared. That means bringing governance, auditability, explainability, and accountability with us.
It’s better to be fashionably late than exposed. Contact us to learn more.
Practical Guidance & Threat Intelligence
Stay a step ahead of the competition–and attackers–with fresh perspectives, practical guidance, and the latest threat intelligence.
To strengthen threat detection and accelerate compliance efforts, tool sprawl needs to be kept under control. Here are four steps to optimize your security tools and combat technology sprawl.
Our team shares key takeaways from Black Hat 2025, including why foundational security practices, AI governance, and insider threat management are more critical than ever for building resilience and aligning cybersecurity with business strategy.
Joseph Karpenko, Field CISO, shares ways to master foundational security practices to dramatically reduce risk, enhance operational resilience, and empower you to stay ahead of evolving cyber threats.
To strengthen threat detection and accelerate compliance efforts, tool sprawl needs to be kept under control. Here are four steps to optimize your security tools and combat technology sprawl.
Our team shares key takeaways from Black Hat 2025, including why foundational security practices, AI governance, and insider threat management are more critical than ever for building resilience and aligning cybersecurity with business strategy.
Joseph Karpenko, Field CISO, shares ways to master foundational security practices to dramatically reduce risk, enhance operational resilience, and empower you to stay ahead of evolving cyber threats.
